“We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and
technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology.
This is a clear prescription for disaster” --- Carl Sagan
Anytime
I watch, listen or observe discussions on the latest hot topic of GMOs, Mr.
Sagan’s quote keep coming to mind. It is important for people to adequately inform
themselves about issues in Science, but it is also important for scientists to
show their work and explain their research without using the technical language
found in journals. Both sides do not usually do this even though science in
modern times relies on public support just as much as the public relies on the
products of science and technology.
So
here is my attempt to explain and state my opinion on the topic. I try to cover
as much as possible without being too technical. But this post is not intended
to be a one-stop-shop for everything on the topic so further individual reading
will be needed.
What are GMOs?
Genetically
Modified Organisms as the name suggest refers to plants, animals or microorganisms
with altered genes using the technique of genetic engineering.
Some
argue that changing the DNA of organisms is nothing new and point out selective
breeding methods used by farmers for centuries as an example. With
biotechnology, we now have greater control of the process. Genetic engineering has
become one of the techniques that is invaluable to science and widely applied in
research, medicine, industry and agriculture.
The issue
of GMOs has taken center-stage in Ghana because of a bill before parliament
called the Plant Breeders Bill. The
conversation is needed, critique is valuable and mobilization to address
concerns by activists is impressive. In discussions
about GMOs some of the main concerns I have come across include:
I.
GMO
seeds from corporations will put our food security in the control of these
corporations. It will limit the ability of farmers to own or save seeds and
freely grow it.
II.
GMOs
and the technology of genetic engineering is a “new” method that requires time
and more testing before we can try
it.
III.
Consensus
- Even scientists are not unanimous on
the safety of GMOs. Hence, GMOs cannot be trusted.
IV.
GMOs
are unhealthy, toxic, cancerous, etc.
I will
address these concerns with the information I have available and opinions
formed on the topic.
GMO seeds from biotech corporations
will put our food security in their control. It will limit the ability of
farmers to own or save seeds and freely grow it.
This to me
is simply connecting the dots. If the history of biotech companies in other
fields is anything to go by, then worrying about seeds becoming unaffordable
and restrictions being placed on their use are legitimate concerns. The biotech
companies might claim ownership of their technology and be unwilling to share
it at reasonable cost, when that happens it is the poor farmers who suffer.
Examples
can be cited from the pharmaceutical industry, research and medicine with
several cases of unreasonably high-priced drugs, reagents and antibodies that
make diagnostic tests and experiments very expensive. After all, they are not
“non-profits”. They are for profit and invest millions (even billions when it
comes to drug development) to develop their technology. A return on that
investment is expected. We would know better than to do business with self-seeking
multinational corporations while we claim to be a poor country that is trying
to help rural farmers. If an economics expert thinks otherwise, I would appreciate
the insight. While I am yet to hear from an economics expert on that regard, I
do not think it a smart move.
Secondly,
we do not have to “outsource” to foreign biotechnology corporations when we have
local agencies like SARI (Savannah Agricultural Research Institute). They have
exhibited their competence in this field even with the challenges they face. SARI
is mandated to improve agricultural technologies. They have made progress even in
developing genetically modified cowpeas, and conducted field tests in northern
Ghana. If the government conducts a complete evaluation and is convinced GMOs
can help, why deal with foreign biotech companies instead of local research
agencies? The latter I argue is better informed on the specific issues our
farmers face and can develop more effective, tailored solutions.
GMOs and the technology of genetic engineering
is a “new” method that requires time and more testing before we can try it.
Some argue
the science hasn’t been done, there is not enough evidence to suggest it is
safe, they are not tested, etc. However,
the use of genetic engineering is not new to science. Neither is its
application in agriculture. The technology is about 30 years old. There is
significant research in the field with thousands of published studies from
biotech companies, government agencies and independent research groups. It is
one of the most well researched areas in science. Which is not to say there is
nothing new to learn, but for now we know a lot about it.
The part of foreign corporations owning and controlling the industry is scary. I had no idea Ghanaian research agencies could do this, let's go with them.
ReplyDeleteYup, SARI is under CSIR.. They have a couple projects I read about. I'm sure they can do more with funding
DeleteI'm a computer Engineer so I will talk from there.
ReplyDeleteI've seen what patent trolling is doing to the IT industry. Apple has been the biggest troll so far.
In the end it's consumers and new start up companies that suffer.
The idea that some foreign company will have some amount of control over seeds is what I find most disturbing
Yes.. once you have profit driven companies in a product, especially something as basic as food/seeds.... It is likely not going to end up well for the "small guys"
DeleteThough this documentary may be biased, it still gives important insight into what to expect with this experiment. Ghana should hasten slowly ...
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omtYlsG1P5U
I was honestly waiting for your view on the topic. This is great, but I really have my own issues, not scientific though, which I may also try and share. I'll make it to the Part 2 and 3 soon. Great post.
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading Terry!
Delete